www.madisonrecord.com | www.stclairrecord.com
Jul. 4, 2009 | Metro East's Legal Journal
 
NEWS

Pizza Hut plaintiff wants $50k in default judgement

5/2/2007 2:00 PM
By Steve Gonzalez -Edwardsville Bureau

Edwardsville attorney Amanda Verett wants a judge to enter a default judgment in excess of $50,000 against a man she opened the door for at Pizza Hut because he failed to answer her lawsuit within 30 days.

Verett filed a civil suit in March alleging she was injured while holding the door open for customers at the Edwardsville restaurant.

She claims she was walking out the door of Pizza Hut on Feb. 12, when she held open the door to allow herself and co-defendant Clarence Jackson to exit.

Last week Verett's attorney, Tom Maag of Edwardsville, filed the motion for default judgment alleging Jackson was served on March 8, and failed to answer the complaint in 30 days as allowed by Illinois law. Judge Nicholas Byron presides over the case.

Verett alleges Jackson grabbed the door she was holding open in such a fashion that it caused the door to suddenly and sharply move which injured her.

She claims Jackson violated his duty to use ordinary care for the safety of others when he operated the Pizza Hut door which caused her to sustain an acromion process impingement in her right shoulder.

Verett claims that due to the injury she suffered at Pizza Hut, she was unable to avoid falling on a later date and tore tendons and suffered injuries to her left hand and wrist, including a partial tear of the pronator quadratus muscle at the dorsum.

She claims her injuries caused her to suffer a disfigurement, severe pain and discomfort and medical expenses.

Verett claims Pizza Hut was negligent by maintaining a door for ingress and egress which was not reasonably safe and was likely to injure people when being held open and grabbed by another.

On April 5, Pizza Hut's attorney Andrew Miller filed an answer claiming Verett was more than 50 percent responsible for her alleged injuries which bars any recovery on her part.

Verett filed a response to Pizza Hut by simply stating that she denies Pizza Hut's affirmative defenses.

Byron has not set a hearing on the default judgment.



EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT | DIGG THIS | POST TO DEL.ICIO.US




COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

blog comments powered by Disqus
EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT

SUBSCRIBE To get our free email newsletter and make changes to your subscription:
 
 Subscribe to Print Edition
 Renew Print Edition Subscription
Right Decision, Wrong Author - 6/28/2009
Your real estate attorney's role in a home purchase - 6/28/2009

ARGUMENTS Archive

Have you ever received an unsolicited fax and considered a class action?
Yes
 
(31%)
No
 
(69%)
Total Votes:67

Thank you for voting in this poll.

This poll is closed.

View Results

Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
Need to know more about us or have questions? Try the links below:
Legal Notices for Publication
Place a Classified ad
Where can you find the print edition of The Record ?
Contact The Record
By way of introduction

Tech experts to speak at People in Business meeting June 23
Wood River insurance rep honored by Mutual of Omaha
New engineer joins Heneghan and Associates
Sandberg Phoenix & von Gontard Charitable Foundation announces charities
ISBA to hold continuing education program on work comp in Fairview Heights
Read actual Madison County class action complaints!
Sign Up
Login
You can advertise in The Record!

Country Hearth Inn & Suites