www.madisonrecord.com | www.stclairrecord.com
Aug. 28, 2008 | Metro East's Legal Journal
 
NEWS

Doctor sued over eye treatment

7/17/2008 7:12 AM

Traci Woolfolk has filed a medical malpractice suit against Dr. Wen Y. Chen, alleging he deviated from the acceptable standard of care when treating her eye issues.

Woolfolk claims on July 18, 2006, Chen treated her for uveitis in her right eye and administered a steroid cortisone injection and sulfa eye drops and continued to be treated until November 2006.

Uveitis is the inflammation of the middle layer of the eye and is estimated to be responsible for ten percent of the blindness in the United States.

Woolfolf filed her lawsuit in Madison County Circuit Court on July 14

She says in court papers she informed and reminded Chen that she was allergic to sulfa prior to her treatment.

Chen is a board certified ophthalmologist with the American Board of Ophthalmology and is a staff physician at the SureVision Surgery and Laser Center in Maryville.

Woolfolk alleges Chen disregarded his duties as a reasonably prudent ophthalmologist when he carelessly and negligently administered a steroid cortisone injection into her right eye when he knew or should have known that it would cause or contribute to cause ocular hypertension in her right eye.

She also alleges Chen carelessly administered sulfa eye drops when he knew she was allergic, failed to diagnose episcleritis and failed to properly listen and review her history that would have revealed she has a history of steroid responsive ocular hypertension.

Woolfolk alleges as a result of Chen's alleged negligence she suffered severe and permanent injuries resulting in permanent drooping eye lid, sustained ocular hypertension and episcleritis and intermittent headaches which caused and continues to cause pain and suffering and medical expenses.

Represented by Chris Donohoo of Wood River, Woolfolk is seeking damages in excess of $100,000, plus costs.

Donohoo filed an affidavit with the complaint stating he was unable to obtain a consultation from another health care provider on the merits of Woolfolk's claims as required by statute because the statute of limitations would have expired.

Donohoo said he will get the required consultation within 90 days.

The case has been assigned to Circuit Judge David Hylla.

08 L 633



EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT | DIGG THIS | POST TO DEL.ICIO.US






COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!


SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE



* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
This Is CAPTCHA Image
Write the characters in the image above: 


EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT

SUBSCRIBE To get our free email newsletter and make changes to your subscription:
 
 Subscribe to Print Edition
 Renew Print Edition Subscription
Our Med Mal Merry-go-Round - 8/24/2008
Workplace laws do not cover independent contractors, part-time workers - 8/24/2008

ARGUMENTS Archive

What do you think of attorney Verett's ARDC punishment?
Harsh
 
 
(15.94%)
Fair
 
 
(7.25%)
Lenient
 
 
(76.81%)
 
This poll is closed.

Total Votes: 69

View Results

Need to know more about us or have questions? Try the links below:
Legal Notices for Publication
Place a Classified ad
Where can you find the print edition of The Record ?
Contact The Record
By way of introduction

National Bank participates in Kids Day America
Moser & Marsalek welcomes Juliano P.C. to practice
People in Business meeting set May 27
Local student honored for Outstanding Volunteer Service at award presentation
Relay for Life team from Hepler Broom hosts trivia night
Read actual Madison County class action complaints!
Sign Up
Login
You can advertise in The Record!



Happiness Spreads